Topic summary
13% 1 analyzed article/video 986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Identity Theft results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 280 hits . Analysis detected 1,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,958 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (13,331 of 16,562 topics). This Identity Theft is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Identity Theft
Topic details
Total words: 2,958
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst