Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iconic Restaurants results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 1,886 hits. Analysis detected 8,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,407 of 16,562 topics). This Iconic Restaurants is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Iconic Restaurants
Topic details
Total words: 5,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 35.1%35.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 27.4%27.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.5%14.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 35.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos