Topic summary
74% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Policy results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,501 hits . Analysis detected 12,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,100 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,056 of 15,785 topics). This Ice Policy is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Ice Policy
Topic details
Total words: 9,100
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst