Topic summary
20% 1 analyzed article/video 567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Cream Shops results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 970 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,701 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (8,189 of 16,562 topics). This Ice Cream Shops is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Ice Cream Shops
Topic details
Total words: 1,701
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst