Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Accountability results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.2% saturation with 1,299 hits. Analysis detected 6,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,874 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,661 of 16,562 topics). This Ice Accountability is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group.
Ice Accountability
Topic details
Total words: 2,874
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.0% percentile
8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 45.2%45.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 29.8%29.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 18.3%18.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.0%17.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.4%28.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 18.2%18.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.1%9.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 45.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 29.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.4%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Horn Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos