Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video507 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hyper Socal Initiative results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 55.3% saturation with 841 hits. Analysis detected 4,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,521 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (726 of 16,562 topics). This Hyper Socal Initiative is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Hyper Socal Initiative
Topic details
Total words: 1,521
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510095.6% percentile
13.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 55.3%55.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.3%33.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 24.7%24.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 20.1%20.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 40.9%40.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 20.4%20.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 13.2%13.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 15.1%15.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.1%17.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 55.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 40.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos