Topic summary
⁠10%3 analyzed articles/videos2,795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunting results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 612 hits. Analysis detected 5,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,729 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (16,073 of 16,562 topics). This Hunting is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
Hunting
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,729
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

3% percentile
02550751003.0% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos