Topic summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos1,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunger results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 1,057 hits. Analysis detected 8,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,131 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,767 of 16,243 topics). This Hunger is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Hunger
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,131
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.4%14.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos