Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humboldt Broncos Crash results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 662 hits. Analysis detected 2,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (12,404 of 15,342 topics). This Humboldt Broncos Crash is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Humboldt Broncos Crash
Topic details
Total words: 5,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos