Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen Pauls results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Anchoring Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 662 hits . Analysis detected 2,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,501 of 6,138 authors). This Karen Pauls is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. Karen Pauls
Author details
Total words: 5,024
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Special Pleading: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst