Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,177 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Relief results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Loss Aversion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 741 hits. Analysis detected 3,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,666 of 16,562 topics). This Humanitarian Relief is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Humanitarian Relief
Topic details
Total words: 4,708
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.7%15.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos