Topic summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 784 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Trafficking Investigations results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 685 hits . Analysis detected 4,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of â 89% (1,855 of 16,562 topics). This Human Trafficking Investigations is worse (more manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. Human Trafficking Investigations
Topic details
Total words: 2,352
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.8% percentile 8.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 22.6% 22.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 21.4% 21.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 29.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst