Topic summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human AI Relationships results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 308 hits . Analysis detected 2,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,962 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,790 of 16,562 topics). This Human AI Relationships is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Human AI Relationships
Topic details
Total words: 1,962
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.1% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.3% 13.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst