Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Human AI Interaction results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 474 faulty-reasoning hits from 650 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Human AI Interaction is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Human AI Interaction
Topic details
Total words: 650
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles650 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.4%15.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 14.0%14.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos