Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hulk Hogan results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 222 hits. Analysis detected 1,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,266 topics). This Hulk Hogan is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hulk Hogan
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,432
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 9.2%9.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.5%15.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos