Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video631 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hudson River results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 324 hits. Analysis detected 1,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,440 of 16,235 topics). This Hudson River is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Hudson River
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,524
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos