Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 631 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hudson River results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 324 hits . Analysis detected 1,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,440 of 16,235 topics). This Hudson River is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group. Hudson River
Topic details
Total words: 2,524
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.2% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst