Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Huawei results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 268 hits. Analysis detected 2,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,124 of 16,562 topics). This Huawei is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Huawei
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.2%8.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos