Topic summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Parks results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 906 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,038 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,899 of 16,356 topics). This Houston Parks is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Houston Parks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,038
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.1%8.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos