Topic summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos1,734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Housing Scams results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 544 hits. Analysis detected 4,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,935 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,992 of 16,562 topics). This Housing Scams is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Housing Scams
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,935
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos