Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Of Representatives Democrats results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 1,539 hits . Analysis detected 9,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,454 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,781 of 16,562 topics). This House Of Representatives Democrats is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. House Of Representatives Democrats
Topic details
Total words: 6,454
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 23.9% 23.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst