Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Ethics Committee results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Bandwagon, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 1,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,035 of 16,562 topics). This House Ethics Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
House Ethics Committee
Topic details
Total words: 1,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos