Topic summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hospital Services results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 293 hits. Analysis detected 2,563 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,862 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,888 of 16,562 topics). This Hospital Services is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Hospital Services
Topic details
Total words: 2,862
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos