Topic summary
⁠50%4 analyzed articles/videos4,057 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Horror results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 3,353 hits. Analysis detected 26,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,949 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,209 of 16,562 topics). This Horror is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Horror
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 29,949
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles29.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos