Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Horoscopes results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 48.5% saturation with 12,595 hits . Analysis detected 40,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,988 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,925 of 16,559 topics). This Horoscopes is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. Horoscopes
Topic details
Total words: 25,988
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.3% percentile 4.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles26K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 48.5% 48.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 22.6% 22.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Indoctrination: Topic 48.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 22.6%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst