Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bryanna Collier results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 56.9% saturation with 4,183 hits . Analysis detected 13,679 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 92% (547 of 6,628 authors). This Bryanna Collier is worse (more manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group. Bryanna Collier
Author details
Total words: 7,352
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.8% percentile 7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 56.9% 56.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 32.3% 32.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 26.7% 26.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 16.8% 16.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.2% 14.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Indoctrination: Author 56.9%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 32.3%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 26.7%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst