Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hormuz Strait results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 596 hits . Analysis detected 4,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,356 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,775 of 16,562 topics). This Hormuz Strait is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Hormuz Strait
Topic details
Total words: 5,356
Article count: 2
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.1% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Tu Quoque: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst