Topic summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hooliganism results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 533 hits. Analysis detected 3,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,928 of 16,562 topics). This Hooliganism is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Hooliganism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.2% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.1%20.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 10.8%10.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos