Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hong Kong Correctional Services Department results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 632 hits. Analysis detected 2,717 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,685 of 16,562 topics). This Hong Kong Correctional Services Department is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Hong Kong Correctional Services Department
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,344
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.0%27.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos