Topic summary
96% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,538 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Homicides results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 712 hits . Analysis detected 6,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,614 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,574 of 16,562 topics). This Homicides is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group. Homicides
Topic details
Total words: 4,614
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.3% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.7%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst