Topic summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Homelessness Trends results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (15,779 of 22,957 topics). This Homelessness Trends is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Homelessness Trends
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos