Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Homelessness Outreach results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.4% saturation with 1,117 hits . Analysis detected 4,597 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,769 of 16,562 topics). This Homelessness Outreach is worse (more manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group. Homelessness Outreach
Topic details
Total words: 2,310
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.3% percentile 8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 48.4% 48.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 39.6% 39.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.8% 17.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Topic 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Topic 48.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 39.6%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.6% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Tu Quoque: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst