Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Homelessness Outreach results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.4% saturation with 1,117 hits. Analysis detected 4,597 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,769 of 16,562 topics). This Homelessness Outreach is worse (more manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
Homelessness Outreach
Topic details
Total words: 2,310
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.3% percentile
8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 48.4%48.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 39.6%39.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.8%17.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.9%18.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 9.1%9.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 48.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 39.6%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Tu Quoque: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos