Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Homeland Security Investigations (hsi) results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 572 hits. Analysis detected 2,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,025 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (3,998 of 16,562 topics). This Homeland Security Investigations (hsi) is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Homeland Security Investigations (hsi)
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠76%Homeland Security Investigations (hsi) (selected)6%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,025
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.9% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 3.8%3.8%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Personal Incredulity: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Tu Quoque: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos