Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Sepic results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 572 hits . Analysis detected 2,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,025 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of â 84% (1,123 of 6,628 authors). This Matt Sepic is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. Matt Sepic
Author details
Total words: 2,025
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.1% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Fundamental Attribution E⌠Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 3.8% 3.8% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 28.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Red Herring: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Personal Incredulity: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.6% Primacy Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Tu Quoque: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst