Topic summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos832 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Holocaust Remembrance results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 1,689 hits. Analysis detected 8,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,162 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,484 of 16,562 topics). This Holocaust Remembrance is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group.
Holocaust Remembrance
Topic details
Total words: 6,162
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.9% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 27.4%27.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.0%15.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.6%5.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos