Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 832 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mandana Dayani results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 49.6% saturation with 1,238 hits . Analysis detected 6,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 94% (424 of 6,628 authors). This Mandana Dayani is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Mandana Dayani
Author details
Total words: 2,496
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.6% percentile 9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 49.6% 49.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 17.2% 17.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 12.8% 12.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.3% 27.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.2% 20.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.1% 8.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 12.9% 12.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Author 49.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 27.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 20.2%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 13.2%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst