Topic summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video652 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Holly Willoughby results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 450 hits. Analysis detected 1,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,941 of 16,562 topics). This Holly Willoughby is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Holly Willoughby
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠59%Holly Willoughby (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,956
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.0%23.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos