Author summary
â 80% 1 analyzed article/video 652 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel McGrath results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 450 hits . Analysis detected 1,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of â 67% (2,192 of 6,628 authors). This Rachel McGrath is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. Rachel McGrath
Author details
Total words: 1,956
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.0% 23.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst