Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video361 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hockey Rivalry results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 656 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,083 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,411 of 16,562 topics). This Hockey Rivalry is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Hockey Rivalry
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,083
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.3%15.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.6%8.6%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.4%4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos