Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hoa Disputes results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 1,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,852 of 16,562 topics). This Hoa Disputes is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Hoa Disputes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,060
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Red Herring: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos