Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These History Of Art Censorship results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 1,264 hits. Analysis detected 7,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,738 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This History Of Art Censorship is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
History Of Art Censorship
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%History Of Art Censorship (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 6,738
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.8%18.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos