Topic summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video1,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Historical Adaptation results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 1,999 hits. Analysis detected 8,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (4,786 of 15,765 topics). This Historical Adaptation is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Historical Adaptation
Topic details
Total words: 5,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.6% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 38.8%38.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 38.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos