Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,055 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Historical Accuracy results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 661 hits. Analysis detected 4,538 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,420 of 16,300 topics). This Historical Accuracy is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Historical Accuracy
Topic details
Total words: 4,220
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.7%15.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos