Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,055 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Casey Chalk results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 661 hits . Analysis detected 4,538 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,258 of 6,629 authors). This Casey Chalk is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Casey Chalk
Author details
Total words: 4,220
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 15.7% 15.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 15.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst