Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hiring Process results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 1,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 990 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,504 of 16,562 topics). This Hiring Process is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
Hiring Process
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 990
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.9% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles990 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 19.3%19.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.4%14.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos