Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hip Hop And Rap results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 460 hits. Analysis detected 2,022 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,508 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (16,497 of 16,558 topics). This Hip Hop And Rap is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
Hip Hop And Rap
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,508
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.4% percentile
0.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos