Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hillsborough results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 283 faulty-reasoning hits from 696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,143 of 16,562 topics). This Hillsborough is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Hillsborough
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 696
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.0% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles696 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos