Hillsborough sheriff’s office investigating death at Dick’s House of Sports in Brandon ⁠6%

By Chris Tisch⁠0%

7/11/2026, 12:28:29 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 174 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (20,572 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the article peer group.

The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office is investigating a death that occurred inside a Dick’s House of Sports store at the Brandon Exchange. 
Chief Deputy Joseph Maurer said deputies received a 911 call from an employee at 4:28 p.m. that reported a gunshot. 
About 30 deputies responded to the scene and found a male dead inside a fitting room. 
Two people running from the scene were detained, Maurer said. 
Maurer said that video showed that three people had walked into Dick’s from the mall and had gone into a fitting room. 
Moments later, two people left the fitting room and ran into a parking lot. 
“There is absolutely no tolerance for violence in Hillsborough County, especially in places where families gather to shop and spend time together,” Sheriff Chad Chronister said in a statement. 
“Our deputies’ training prepared them to respond immediately, secure the scene, detain those involved within minutes, and bring order to a dangerous situation.” 
No other details were immediately released. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 2.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.7%Chris Tisch: 4.2%Tampa Bay Times: 3.8%Framing Effect16.7%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 2.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 3.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 13.2%Chris Tisch: 1.9%Tampa Bay Times: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 3.7%Tampa Bay Times: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.2%Chris Tisch: 3.7%Tampa Bay Times: 2.6%Appeal to Authority13.2%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 2.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.7%Chris Tisch: 7.0%Tampa Bay Times: 4.4%Appeal to Emotion16.7%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 1.9%Tampa Bay Times: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 8.7%Tampa Bay Times: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 3.2%Tampa Bay Times: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 1.9%Tampa Bay Times: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

174 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers60%attributed speech70writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph Maurer • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph Maurer • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJoseph Maurer • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSheriff Chad Chronister • 29 words • 0.0% coverageSheriff Chad Chronister • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
52 attributed words50% of attributed speech0% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.