Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High Wind Warnings results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 57.4% saturation with 549 hits . Analysis detected 2,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 957 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.4% and a BS Rank of 97% (505 of 16,559 topics). This High Wind Warnings is worse (more manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group. High Wind Warnings
Topic details
Total words: 957
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.0% percentile 15.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles957 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 57.4% 57.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 20.7% 20.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 24.0% 24.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 23.7% 23.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 21.5% 21.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Topic 57.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 26.0%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst