Topic summary
⁠31%3 analyzed articles/videos2,982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High School Football results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Recency Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,139 hits. Analysis detected 5,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,928 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (19,126 of 22,727 topics). This High School Football is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
High School Football
Topic details
Total words: 11,928
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos