Author summary
30%2 analyzed articles/videos2,581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jarrid Denney results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Recency Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 976 hits. Analysis detected 4,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,324 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 21% (7,064 of 8,874 authors). This Jarrid Denney is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Jarrid Denney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
21%Jarrid Denney (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,324
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510020.4% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 9.4%9.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos